As in a previous post, I discussed the fact that the students, although young, should have been requested, yes even required, to give direct testimony in the VP's, ( EP) criminal trial.
These three video clips are examples as to why I feel that way.
A public trial teaches us more than any testimony in a civil trial. Do not sign any NDA in civil cases with schools. Make sure prosecutors do their jobs.
These three videos describe some graphic details, especially this first one. It is criminal that students can commit murder in "very safe" environments.
See my posts on workplace violence and how divorce can be a factor in my soap operas ideas. I do not care how mentally ill someone is, to be honest. Criminal is criminal.
This first video does not involve a gun.
https://youtu.be/EKi2RI0ZXio?si=0sEruuSlv7KGsShC
Per above link, a language barrior with the custodian impact cleaning up a crime scene, really?
Just an ordinary day they say.
https://youtu.be/k2C_uGbCoV8?si=K2bLZxIaXX5Lng1Z
Shared experience
https://youtu.be/uuxda0aEKLE?si=Ao-L-y9vn5utvMrs
Not a fan of the movement to ban guns. Watch the first video to understand why. This young woman in the third video is well spoken. Her take as a student in the middle school in Parkland (not in the high school) and in another building at Brown seems to matter. But she did not witness the shootings.
Does it make you righteously angry that one person can wreak havoc and chaos, and a defense attorney underplays the impact on the young students in a criminal trial because nobody died in the first grade classroom? They witnessed first hand, their teacher get shot and at least one was threatened.
Marian R. Carlino
May 31, 2026